TWO USUAL SUSPECTS ON FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT BOARD [Make that THREE]

..BUILT IN BIAS IN PLACE TO CENSOR YOUR AND OUR POSTS.



Facebook Appoints Brotherhood Operative to New Oversight Board



Tawakkol Karman speaks to the media in Istanbul while protesting the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi. Karman, a Muslim Brotherhood operative was recently appointed to Facebook's oversight board (Photo: Chris McGrath/Getty Images)
Tawakkol Karman speaks to the media in Istanbul while protesting the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi. Karman, a Muslim Brotherhood operative, was recently appointed to Facebook’s oversight board (Photo: Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

Facebook appointed a Muslim Brotherhood operative to its new oversight board which is tasked with reviewing posts on Facebook and Instagram to make sure they are not violating “community standards.”
The appointment of Tawakkol Karman, a former leading figure in the Yemini Al Islah (Muslim Brotherhood) party, was hailed by the Council of American-Islamic Relation’s (CAIR) Los Angeles director Hussam Ayloush (who himself recommends the U.S. should embrace the Hamas terrorist group).
Just a year ago, Karman wrote on Facebook, “The Muslim Brotherhood movement will remain an anti-tyranny and a freedom fighting movement, despite Trump’s nose and Trump’s agents and it is one of the victims of tyranny and official terrorism in the region, for which Trump provides all support and support.”
Here are some highlights from an extensive profile of Karman as reported by the Investigative Project on Terrorism:
  • During the popular uprising against former Egyptian President and Islamist Mohammed Morsi, Karman initially called on Morsi to resign and for General al-Sisi to form an interim government.However, she ended up joining the violent Morsi supporters in the Rabaa camp and has since been barred from entering Egypt. She now calls Morsi “the last of the prophets.”
  • She initially supported the Saudi campaign in Yemen to rid the country of the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, but later turned against the Saudis, accusing them of wanting to “occupy Yemen and steal its wealth” as well as “spread their influence.”“[The Saudi’s want] to make Yemen a failed state,” she now says.Her accusations against the Saudis caused her own Al Islah party to suspend her membership in 2018.
  • In 2012, she was granted Turkish citizenship. From Turkey, she launched a Pro-Islamist Yemeni television station Belqees TV.Karman is a big supporter for justice for slain journalist and Muslim Brotherhood operative Jamal Khashoggi, who was killed by the Saudis in their consulate in Istanbul.
  • Karman generated controversy in 2011 when she won the Nobel Prize for her “non-violent struggle for the safety of women and for women’s rights to full participation in peace-building work.”The Yemeni Association for Human Rights and Immigration and the Yemeni Coalition for Civil Society Organizations called her a “war monger and not a peace messenger” due to her involvement in a 2011 protest in Yemen that ended in with a massacre of the protesters.
  • American Enterprise Institute Scholar Michael Rubin summed up Karman when he wrote in 2014, “Peace and human rights seem to be less of a priority” to her “than the promotion of Islamism. She interprets human rights through a sectarian lens. How tragic that the Nobel Committee, so desperate to make a politically correct statement, ended up empowering someone who may embrace non-violent protest, but stands very much for the opposite of peace and universal human rights.”
Besides her obvious biases and affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood — a group whose ideology has spawned the most violent terror groups of our time and perpetrates terror itself – Karman is known for blocking from her own social media accounts anyone who disagrees with her.
A person who is so clearly intent on shutting down dialogue while holding extremist views is hardly a welcome candidate for deciding for the rest of us which posts on social media giants Facebook and Instagram should see the light of day or be censored.


Facebook Appoints Left-Wing Activist Who Attacked Barron Trump to Hate Speech Supreme Court

Self-described "snarky, bisexual, Jewish woman" who used Barron Trump as a punchline appointed as content reviewer

This week, Facebook released the list of 20 people who will serve on its Oversight Board and decide what memes and news articles should be removed for breaking Facebook’s “Community Guidelines” on hate speech and misinformation.

Amongst the various controversial personalities on the list, which includes journalists, professors, activists, and former government officials including an ex-director general of the Israeli Ministry of Justice, is left-wing activist professor Pamela Karlan.
Karlan, who describes herself as a “snarky, bisexual Jewish woman,” previously made headlines last December when she brought up up President Donald Trump’s son Barron as a punchline during the failed impeachment hearings.

Just when you thought this impeachment hoax couldn’t get anymore ridiculous, the witness invited by Democrats is throwing cheap shots at the 13 year old son of @realDonaldTrump. Gross and shameful!

7,504 people are talking about this

Karlan later apologized for her remark that “while the President can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron.”
The Stanford Law professor infamously went on a tirade about “straight, white, sons of the patriarchy” during a speech at the 2006 American Constitutional Society convention, stating, “we have more reason than they do to love America. The rich, pampered, prodigal, sanctimonious, incurious, white, straight sons of the powerful do pretty well everywhere in the world, and they always have.”
Karlan added, “But what about us? Snarky, bisexual, Jewish women who want the freedom to say what we think, read what we want, and love who we do.”
During the impeachment hearings, Karlan also appeared to advocate for a militaristic, Russophobic approach to foreign policy, suggesting that the United States should arm Ukrainian insurgents “so they fight the Russians there and we don’t have to fight them here.”

Thanks to Pamela Karlan for so aptly capturing Democratic elites' delusional, Reaganite, jingoistic Cold Warrior mindset in your claim that we need to arm Ukraine "so they fight the Russians there and we don't have to fight them here" & we remain "that shining city on the hill."

2,148 people are talking about this

Facebook’s content moderation policies have already come under fire by those who have experienced political censorship on the platform while illegal content stays up for days or weeks at a time.
In April, Facebook took several days to delete a page that posted explicit child pornography.

HERE'S THE GATES' CLUB ....... AND YOU AIN'T IN IT !

..
THE CLUB OF OLIGARCHS......

Billionaires
What do you get when you give a repulsive nerd who spent his formative years getting humiliated by jocks more than a hundred billion dollars?
A pastel-jumper-wearing control freak communist, by the looks.
Yikes.
A more equal world?
How did we get to such a point of ridiculous doublethink? I hear from normies who still watch TV that Gates ‘gave all his money away’ because he’s such a nice guy. If that’s the case, why did his net wealth grow from 75 billion in 2016 to 106 billion today, according to conspiracy blog Forbes?
The truth is, Gates is a kingpin in the most exclusive club in the world. He’s the world’s top billionaire, and like all billionaires he uses his wealth to leverage political influence to not only get richer but also engineer society according to his utopian vision of how we genetically inferior plebs should be organised.
In historical terms, Gates is an oligarch. That’s not a term we use much these days, but it was understood very well in the ancient world. Nowadays, the propaganda calls oligarchs nice things like ‘philanthropist’, even when they party repeatedly with fake billionaire ‘philanthropists’ who run pedophile ring compromat operations for Mossad.
He’s just such a fun guy.
It is becoming widely understood now that people have more time on their hands thanks to unemployment that men like Gates operate a shadow government which decides what The Agenda for the world is going to be. Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates has pushed the global warming agendaatmospheric geoengineering, the war on men, the frankenmeat agenda, the anti-white education agenda, the smart cities program, the UN Sustainable Development Goals and of course has taken over the World Health Organisation and sought to turn vaccinations into a global health monopoly for the Gates Foundation.
He just wants to save the chickens.
He’s such a nice guy.
If you want to interpret a man’s current actions, look at the pattern of his past behaviour. With Bill, this is clear. Gates’ strategy is to turn necessary items such as computer operating systems and now vaccines into a monopoly, then use the money generated to defend that monopoly by buying further political leverage and control.
Many doctors themselves are not on board with this agenda. Some have complained about Gates’ monopolisation of public health in top medical journals. Yet even the voices of top medical practitioners get drowned out by the ocean of dollars that Bill bestows on research institutions, global institutions and fawning politicians.
This is the real plague, far more dangerous to your health and liberty than the China Flu. The plague of billionaires who infect our public and private institutions and corrupt them to engineer a society organised along their interests, and not ours.
We saw here in Australia this same phenomenon recently.
Why is Twiggy Forrest not in custody for treason?
Because he’s a billionaire.
Why does Kerry Stokes not have to go into quarantine like the proles after returning from overseas travel during a pandemic?
Because he’s a billionaire.
The arch villain billionaire utopian control freak is, of course, George Soros. He has used his mysteriously acquired billions to wage a personal war against the Christian West for decades.
The billionaire elite aren’t just errant individuals enjoying their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. They’re a club, and they’ve had plans for how to better organise us proles for a very long time.
Most of those plans revolve around a form of ideology predicated on utopian equality and centralised decision-making. You could call it technocracy, or sustainable development goals, or communism. You can read their plans in the proclamations by globalist groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group and, in a previous era, the Club of Rome.
Like George Carlin said, it’s a club, and you ain’t in it.
They share information about market movements and future political decisions to maintain their position while funding propaganda to make the proles poorer and more debt enslaved over time.
The club has its debates and its rivalries, but until 2016 there was a consensus in the club about The Agenda. The billionaires kept funding the political left and the political right to keep up the puppet show we call politics, but there was agreement when it came to the top priorities of the club: open borders, public and private debt expansion in the West and wealth transfer to the East, increasing global governance and the use of the global warming myth to bring about some form of a New World Order.
The totalitarian response to COVID-19 and the destruction of small and medium sized businesses in Western countries through lockdowns is an extension of this same tyrannical globo-communist agenda.
And if you resist, you’ll find out why the police have been militarised over recent decades and why the brainwashing of political correctness has been pushed hardest among the boys and girls and zhes in blue.
This agenda was on track to continue without interruption until one of the club, an outsider who wasn’t taken seriously by technocrats like Gates, did the unthinkable.
He broke ranks and captured the presidency for himself.

Liberal Tears

If you want to understand current events, look at what happened in similar times in the past. There is a rhythm to history. It operates cyclically, and if we are willing to put aside ideology and look at it plainly it will speak to us.
America was founded as a republic modeled explicitly on the political system of ancient Rome, and the history of Republican Rome is one of conquest and expansion then civil wars between oligarchs which brought down the established political order. Ultimately, aristocratic outsider Julius Caesar ended the republican system by breaking the power of the oligarchs and installing a hereditary military dictatorship.
What we have seen since 2016 is a covert war, but it is not being fought between ‘Democrats’ and ‘Republicans’. That’s a pantomime for children. It’s a war between the oligarchy and Donald Trump, the outsider who they hate because they can’t control him and because he has broken with The Agenda of the club.
Is Trump on our side then? I don’t think so. I think Trump is on Trump’s side.
Is rule by Emperor Trump better than domination by oligarch Gates?
Anything’s got to be better than that.


..